A Botched Investigation and Unanswered Questions
Wed, Jan 23, 2008It has been two years to the day that our son was hit and killed by (in our opinion) an at fault driver. This post is about how three different police departments botched up the investigation.
Dustin was considered at fault before the departments even started investigating. The final disposition contradicts the witnesses’ statements including the driver. Time frames do not match up and very little “investigating” was done. The Township Police Chief Mr. Green said in a statement to the Saginaw News early that morning before Dustin’s name was even released
“The biker was likely trying to cross from the southwest side of Dixie to the northeast side”.
The article also states that they did not even know if he was walking or riding his bike so how could they say it was his fault already. All three local news stations also stated in their first reports of the accident that it was Dustin’s fault. No one even gave him a chance, except us, his parents. This is our chance to try and clear Dustin’s name and expose the blind investigating of our local police departments. I will touch on key points in the investigation with complete witnesses’ statements. The only thing that will be different from the original report is the name of the boy that was with our son.
Arrival On The Scene:
Officer Flemming – I observed what appeared to be feathers in the area of the turn lane. I observed both North and south bound traffic to be suddenly stopping……I observed a vehicle stopped directly in front of the unknown object. I activated my emergency lights and turned the patrol vehicle to block the left hand lane of southbound traffic. I realized the unknown object to be a person. I advised Central Dispatch. I observed Township Fire Chief Nelson to be stopped in his vehicle in the right hand lane of southbound Dixie. I observed the vehicle that had been stopped in front of the victim had now moved approximately 100 feet south of where I had first observed it. (Why did the driver move the vehicle after the police arrived? No one ever asked!)
While assessing the victim I observed a shoe and a pair of glasses approximately 200 feet north of the victim.
Officers Actions:
Officer Flemming – ….While moving my patrol car I observed a white male, approximately 15 years old walking northbound on north side of Dixie. I observed the male to be wearing a red and silver jacket. (This is important because for us the lighting has been a major issue in this investigation. The officer was able to see the boy walking on the other side of the highway and even in the “dark” conditions she was able to tell what color coat he had on. “This boy” was with our son at the time he was hit and was walking to find our other son to tell him.)
Lighting:
Officer Flemming– Original police report stated that the area was dark with no lighting.
Investigation Report– States At the time of the accident it was dark.
COMPLETELY FALSE!
The premise of the investigation was that Dustin was wearing dark clothing on a black bicycle on a dark highway, therefore the driver could not see him. Yet as you read the witnesses statement at least two other drivers seen him, the Fire Chief seen his body in the rear view mirror, and Officer Flemming was able to see his glasses and shoe 200 feet away. We drive this road every morning there are street lights on both sides of the highway every fifty feet, and flood lights in front of The State Police Post where the impact happened. You are able to see at least a half a mile down the road. The morning of the accident we watched Dustin ride his bike across Dixie Highway from our house, which is a block away and we were still able to see him when he entered the sidewalk.